Effectiveness of the court system
In practice, the duration of the process depends on several factors such as: the complexity of the case; the degree of urgency; and procedural objections raised by the opposing party. Decisions on urgent interlocutory motions can be obtained between one day and one month after the referral to the court, depending on the urgency of the case.
For an ordinary case, the procedure lasts on average one year in first instance, one year in appeal, and from one to three years before the Supreme Court. There are several types of interim remedies available to preserve the interests of the parties, pending judgment, for example:
Protective measures. In the event of an emergency where the recovery of a debt is compromised, the president of the court of first instance may authorize any creditor who can prove a justified debt, and which appears to be justified in principle to carry out a protective seizure or to register a pledge on the debtor's business or real estate. The creditors present their requests accompanied by the supporting documents of their claim to obtain an order from the President of the Court of First Instance. They then enforce the provisional measure and finally notify the debtor of the order accompanied by a summons to obtain validation of the judgment on the merits, garnishment. Any creditor may ask the court for authorization to seize sums or property belonging to the debtor, but in the hands of a third party and the debtor, to secure a definitive claim. If the creditor holds an enforceable title (judgment, notarial deed), the execution can be carried out directly through a bailiff. If the obligee does not have an enforceable title, a petition must be made to the presiding judge of the court of first instance and an authorization order obtained. Then, the creditor must serve the order on the debtor accompanied by an order on the merits and in validation of the garnishment.
In all urgent cases or when it is necessary to rule in summary proceedings on problems of execution of a title or an enforceable judgment, the plaintiff may have the other party summoned before the judge in summary proceedings without complying at the usual deadline for a quotation, on a date other than the ordinary date. trial court hearing dates.
The interim relief judge may, among other things, order an expert report, prohibit certain manifestly unlawful acts punishable by a daily fine, evict a tenant, order a receiver, appoint a provisional or special receiver of a company.
But to avoid judicial slowness, the Djiboutian legislator has quantified the number of adjournments and extension of deliberations in the new code of civil procedure instituted by law n° 004/AN/18/8ème L of April 12, 2018. In this meaning that it provided in article L212-16 of the code of civil procedure that “The procedure, from its starting point until the pronouncement of the final judgment, must be carried out within a reasonable time.
The maximum number of adjournments for the exchange of submissions and documents of the parties is limited to six for each instance and the period between the introduction of the instance and the pleadings may not exceed eight months.
The maximum number of extensions of his deliberation by the judge is limited to three and the time between the pleadings and the pronouncement of the judgment cannot exceed two months.
The limits of dismissals and deadlines provided for in paragraphs 2 and 3 can only be exceeded in the event of unforeseen and exceptional circumstances”.
Under the terms of the said article, an ordinary case must be judged within a reasonable period of up to ten months before each instance (first instance, court of appeal and supreme court). The unreasonable delay in judgment entails defective functioning of the justice service and obliges the State to repair the damage caused as a result.
Arbitration
The right of arbitration was governed by a dispersed way between three sources of laws namely:
- The International Code of Arbitration of February 13, 1984 (Code): which governs only arbitrations involving international commercial interests. This code is still in force but has never been implemented in practice because the institutions it refers to have not been established (e.g. the Arbitration Appeals Commission and the International Center for arbitration services). This code is supplemented by the articles of the Civil Procedure Code of Djibouti instituted by Law No. 004/AN/18/8th L of April 12, 2018.
- Articles 1003 to 1028 of the civil procedure code of Djibouti: corresponding to the same provisions of the old French civil procedure code, and which apply to all types of arbitration. These texts are repealed and replaced by the articles of the Civil Procedure Code of Djibouti instituted by Law No. 004/AN/18/8th L of April 12, 2018.
- Articles L2311-1 to L2316-4 of the Djibouti Commercial Code of August 1, 2012 (NDCC): which apply to any arbitration between traders (national or international) when the seat of the arbitration is in the Republic of Djibouti.There are no arbitration institutions at the national level. The parties appoint ad hoc arbitrators (e.g. the President of the Port Authority and the President of the Bar etc.).
The new Code of Civil Procedure instituted by Law No. 004/AN/18/8th L of April 12, 2018, has consolidated and harmonized the rules relating to Internal Arbitration and International Arbitration which were dispersed between the three texts of the aforementioned laws.
The Right of Arbitration is now generally governed by the Civil Procedure Code of Djibouti instituted by Law No. 004/AN/18/8th L of April 12, 2018 - Articles L.710-1 to L.733 -13 of the new code of civil procedure of Djibouti. This code took over from the Djiboutian Code of International Arbitration instituted by Law No. 79/AN/84/1ère L, largely supplementing it by defining all the general and technical aspects necessary for a harmonious implementation of the arbitration and its decisions.
In Djibouti, the courts are generally in favour of arbitration. When there is an arbitration clause in a contract, a local court will declare that it is not competent to deal with the case and will invite the parties to go to arbitration. The President of the Court of First Instance of Djibouti may grant interim measures notwithstanding the existence of an arbitration clause.
The state courts will decline their jurisdiction when the dispute before them is the subject of a valid arbitration agreement between the parties, even if the seat of the arbitration does not come under the territorial jurisdiction of the Djiboutian courts. The jurisprudence of the Supreme Court is well established in this sense, but it happens that the Court of First Instance and the Courts of Appeal refuse to apply arbitration agreements if they are not signed by all the parties (bills of lading by example).
Indeed, before the referral of the case to the arbitrator, and in exceptional circumstances, thereafter, in cases where the urgency of the interim and conservatory measures requested would not allow the arbitrator to take a decision in time, the parties may request such measures (including provisional seizures on the property of a debtor located in Djibouti on the date of the request) should be taken by the competent judicial authority.
The courts of Djibouti generally recognise domestic arbitral awards on the condition that they have been rendered in accordance with the applicable rules. However, the arbitral award maybe the subject of an action for annulment before a competent local court if:
a) The award was made in the absence of an arbitration agreement or on a null or expired agreement;
b) The arbitral tribunal has been irregularly constituted or the sole arbitrator irregularly appointed;
c) The arbitral tribunal has ruled without complying with the mission entrusted to it;
d) The principle of contradiction has not been respected or where the rights of the defence have been infringed;
e) The relief awarded is contrary to international public policy; or
f) The arbitration award is not reasoned.
Enforcement of foreign judgements
The Republic of Djibouti is a party to the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
In order to be enforceable in Djibouti, foreign judgments and foreign arbitral awards must be granted an exequatur order from the Court of First Instance of Djibouti. The exequatur is granted by the President of the Djibouti Court of First Instance on receipt of a petition made in accordance with the following conditions:
the foreign judgment or arbitral award, was rendered by a competent court in accordance with the rules on conflicts of laws, as accepted in Djibouti.
the foreign judgment or the arbitral award has the force of res judicata and is enforceable in the jurisdiction where it was rendered; and
- the parties have been duly convened, represented or declared in default; and the judgment does not contravene public order within the meaning of Djiboutian law and is not contrary to any decision of Djiboutian justice having res judicata authority.
A party wishing to obtain an exequatur order must submit to the President of the Djibouti Court of First Instance a copy of a certified French translation of the foreign judgment or, in the case of arbitration, a copy of the certified French translation of the arbitral award and the arbitration agreement.
Perception of the local courts
Djibouti Courts are perceived by local populations and companies as fair. In the Free Zones (a dozen of areas without customers) and for foreign investments, there are generally arbitration clauses.
Free Zones are basically tax free zones (see Free Zones’ Code dated 17 May 2004). There are currently 13 Free Zones.
Judiciary
Supreme Court magistrates are appointed by the president with the advice of the Superior Council of the Magistracy or CSM. It is a 10-member body consisting of 4 judges, 3 members (non parliamentarians and judges) appointed by the president, and 3 appointed by the National Assembly president or speaker. Magistrates appointed for life with retirement at age 65.
The constitutional Council consists of 6 Magistrates, 2 appointed by the president of the republic, 2 by the president of the National Assembly, and 2 by the CSM. Magistrates are appointed for 8-year, non-renewable terms.
Structure of the court system
The judicial organization of Djibouti includes a single jurisdictional order with a double degree of jurisdiction. This structure coexists with customary law justice and Charian justice.
- Customary justice
She deals with minor disputes in civil matters (neighborhood disputes or disputes relating to residential rents). The customary courts are presided over by civil administrators and are located in the chief towns of the districts (four interior districts) as well as in the districts of the capital. The influence of this justice tends to decrease and only the customary court of the city of Djibouti functions.
In parallel with the customary justice instituted by the texts, customary justice is rendered by the okal (tribal notables), chiefs of clans and districts, for the settlement of disputes in civil and criminal matters.
- Charian justice
It applies Islamic law and is rendered by the cadis (wise men), distributed in the chief towns of the districts and in the districts of the capital.
The grand cadi of Djibouti is also a judge of appeal. Charian justice had exclusive jurisdiction for people of the Muslim faith only, in matters of succession, celebration of marriage, divorce, alimony and child custody.The law of June 30, 2003 in family matters replaced the Sharia courts with a personal status court of first instance, whose headquarters are in Djibouti-ville and whose jurisdiction extends to the entire national territory. In addition, the law created a personal status appeals chamber within the Djibouti Court of Appeal.Article 6 of the 2003 law provides that "The personal status court of first instance has jurisdiction to rule in the first instance on all disputes relating to marriage, filiation, divorce, custody of children, alimony and all other matters relating to personal status. The court is also competent in matters of inheritance, debts, residential leases, and in matters of civil and commercial matters when the amount of the dispute does not exceed 5,000,000 Djibouti Francs
- State justice (common law jurisdiction)
The rules governing the jurisdictional organization are codified in constant law and consolidated in the code of civil procedure instituted by law n° 004/AN/18/8ème L of April 12, 2018.
The said code has reinforced and reaffirmed the uniqueness of the order of jurisdictions with a double degree of jurisdiction which includes:
First degree:
a) The Court of First Instance (Jurisdiction of common law); It has jurisdiction over the entire territory of the Republic of Djibouti. It is made up of specialized chambers which rule with a single judge: civil chamber, commercial chamber, social chamber and correctional chamber.
b) The Personal Status Court (Special Jurisdiction - Sharian Law - Personal Law, Family Law and Inheritance Law)
Second degree:
a) The Court of Appeal (second degree court) hears appeals brought against the judgments of the court of first instance. It is organized into specialized chambers: Civil Chamber, Commercial Chamber, Social Chamber, Indictment Chamber (responsible for the control of the investigating judges) and the Criminal Court (competent in matters of criminal offences).
b) Administrative tribunal which was created by the law of July 19, 2009 - competent in administrative litigation matters and instituted in the same judicial jurisdiction as that of the Court of Appeal. Appeals against its decisions are made to the administrative chamber of the Supreme Court.
Court of Cassation: This is not a third-degree court -
The Supreme Court is the Court of Cassation, responsible for ensuring compliance with the rules of law. Its chairman is appointed by the President of the Republic.
The Code of Civil Procedure instituted by Law No. 004/AN/18/8th L of 12 April 2018 took up major principles of procedural law, such as the right to a fair trial, the right to quality justice, the right of action and right of execution. Progress in implementing the code to date includes the introduction of simplified procedures for the settlement of small claims. The High Court of Justice is a special jurisdiction established by the Constitution of September 15, 1992. It is composed of members appointed by the National Assembly. The High Court of Justice is competent to try the President of the Republic and the ministers impeached by the National Assembly, on account of acts qualified as high treason or attack on honor and offenses committed in the exercise of their functions.