This article looks at the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS) and how it could reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the aviation sector.
It provides an overview of key features of the system, differences with the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) and commentary on the possibility of linking with the EU or a global scheme.
INTRODUCTION TO THE UK ETS
With COP26 recently concluded and the concern created by the IPCC's 2021 Climate Change Report, which summarises the physical science basis of climate change for policymakers, decarbonisation is at the forefront of everyone's minds. Commercial aviation accounts for between 2-3% of global carbon emissions, and approximately 12% of all CO2 emissions from the transportation sector. Although these figures may appear surprisingly low, aviation is a growing industry and with an increasing number of flights, carbon emissions from aviation are predicted to triple by 2050. One of the measures implemented to help decarbonise aviation are emissions trading schemes.
The UK Emissions Trading Scheme took effect on 1 January 2021 as a replacement of the EU ETS after the UK's withdrawal from the European Union. Both the UK and EU ETS are cap and trade schemes, seeking to reduce GHG emissions in energy intensive sectors, including aviation. This means that a cap is set on the total emissions participants are able to produce, which decreases over time. Participants receive tradeable allowances within this cap which they can trade with other participants as needed.
The UK ETS was enacted through section 44 of the Climate Change Act 2008, as well as the Finance Act 2019. Its framework is set out in the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme Order 2020. There are four ETS regulators in the UK: the Environment Agency for England or outside the UK, the Northern Ireland Environmental Agency, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency and Natural Resources Wales.
OVERVIEW OF UK ETS
KEY DIFFERENCES FROM EU ETS
The UK ETS largely mirrors the design of the EU ETS overall, with a few key differences. The UK ETS obviously has a smaller scope, covering the UK, Gibraltar and the EEA. The cap on emissions in the UK ETS is 5% lower than that of the EU scheme, meaning the UK has implemented a slightly stricter regime. The UK ETS has an ARP of £22 to ensure price continuity, although this is likely to be withdrawn as the UK scheme develops, and a CCM allowing greater intervention powers in relation to significant extended price elevation in the market.
LINKING
There is the possibility of linking the UK ETS with the EU scheme. The UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement commits both the UK and EU to giving serious consideration to linking their respective trading schemes, suggesting doing so will preserve their integrity and possibly increase their effectiveness. The UK Government remains open to linking the UK ETS internationally but has not yet made any decision in respect of any preferred linking partners.
EMISSIONS REDUCTION AND CARBON LEAKAGE
So far the UK ETS is making itself distinct from the EU trading scheme, by introducing a stricter cap on emissions and looking to include credits for technologies such as direct air capture. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) estimates that the first two phases of the EU ETS led to a 10% reduction in carbon emissions. Although on a smaller scale, the UK ETS, with stricter caps and the inclusion of GHG removals, could hopefully contribute to a similar, if not greater, reduction in aviation emissions.
It is important to consider the global nature of aviation and more specifically carbon leakage. The UK Climate Change Committee suggests that there are some risks that a unilateral UK approach to tackling carbon emissions could lead to carbon leakage or competition concerns within the UK aviation industry. This should be borne in mind in deciding whether to link the UK and EU ETS. There are 24 emissions trading schemes in force worldwide, covering 16% of global carbon emissions (this figure was raised significantly after China launched its national ETS). There are plans in place for approximately 30 more schemes to be introduced across the world. Such an uptake of national emissions trading schemes means that the risk of carbon leakage should be lessened.
The EU ETS has been criticised for including free allowances for aviation. As mentioned above, the justification for these free allowances is that aviation is a sector at higher risk of carbon leakage. This risk is not particularly high, however, due to the impracticalities and costs of airlines relocating (such as administration and staff costs, establishing new routes and possible fuel implication of re-routing). In its European Green Deal, the European Commission has proposed to phase out free emission allowances for aviation.
The UK Government published a call for evidence to review the UK ETS free allocation, which closed in April 2021, with a view to better incentivising emissions reduction. The government consultation following this call for evidence is ongoing, and it is unclear whether the UK Government intends to phase out the allocation of free allowances for aviation.
A GLOBAL ETS?
Is there a possibility for a global ETS? Article 6 of the Paris Agreement sets out the possibility of creating a new carbon market under the supervision of the United Nations. Article 6 envisages linking emissions trading schemes globally, allowing the international transfer of carbon credits, and establishing a new mechanism by which to trade carbon credits based on emissions reductions from low-carbon projects. An agreement was reached at this year's COP26 on international carbon markets which finalised Article 6 and made the Paris Agreement now fully operational. Although there was no formal creation of a global ETS, the agreement creates a centralised system open to public and private sectors and resolves issues relating to bilateral carbon trades.
The agreement also designates a twelve-member Supervisory Body to oversee the new centralised system and review baselines of recognised credits. There are nonetheless criticisms of the deal struck, notably that some developing countries can continue to use a certain number of old credits under the Kyoto Protocol's Clean Development Mechanism, which allows emissions reduction projects in developing countries to earn carbon credits. It is thought that the inclusion of these old credits in the new framework will potentially flood the market with cheap credits that depress carbon prices. It will be necessary to see how these developments mature in order to see their effectiveness in reducing CO2 emissions.
Going forward, the UK ETS has potential to help decarbonise the aviation sector as other measures such as sustainable aviation fuels are developed. With its lower cap, potential adoption of credit mechanisms for the use of GHG removals and the option to link the scheme internationally (particularly in light of the finalisation of Article 6) the UK ETS has the ability to reduce aviation and overall transport emissions.